Thursday, November 28, 2024

Thanksgiving themed post from the Louise Brooks Society

In the late 1920s, Louise Brooks film's were shown on Thanksgiving day, as well as on just about every day of the year in some cities. This post highlights a few Thanksgiving screenings archived in the collection of the Louise Brooks Society.

In Canada in 1927, the Thanksgiving holiday was celebrated on different days on a regional and even local basis. Nationally, the holiday was set to take place on July 3rd. But as the above advertisement from Nanaimo, British Columbia shows, a special showing of Rolled Stockings was announced for the local Bijou theatre on an alternate holiday – Monday, November 7th. (... Some thirty years after this Thanksgiving Day screening, the Governor General of Canada issued a proclamation stating the Thanksgiving holiday would henceforth be observed throughout the nation on the second Monday in October.)

In the United States, Thanksgiving takes place on the last Thursday in November. South of the border on November 24, 1927, the popular Louise Brooks comedy Now We're in the Air was showing in Appleton, Wisconsin. The film, which the Appleton Post-Cresent described as a "nonsense opera", was going over "big," according to the local newspaper. The advertisement for Fischer's theatre (shown below) proclaims "After that Thanksgiving Day Dinner Come on Down," noting Brooks is the "leading lady and how she leads." Notably, the accompanying short film is Love Em and Feed Em (starring Max Davidson & Oliver Hardy); its title is a take off on Brooks' 1926 film, Love Em and Leave Em.


Appleton moviegoers who couldn't get enough of Louise Brooks could return to Fischer's the following Saturday or Sunday, where another 1927 Brooks film, The City Gone Wild, was showing. How's that for a cinematic feast? 

Elsewhere around the United States in 1927, The City Gone Wild was showing on Thanksgiving Day in Cincinnati, Ohio at the Walnut theatre, while Now We're in the Air was showing in Allentown, Pennsylvania at the Strand. Or, if you live in Bloomington, Illinois, you can take in The City Gone Wild at the Irvin theatre (shown below), as the turkey bordered advertisement below shows. It remarkable that the local Bloomington newspaper had enough turkey dingbats to set a border.


On Thursday, November 29th - Thanksgiving Day in 1928, the recently released Louise Brooks film Beggars of Life was showing in Hartford, Connecticut. The Hartford Courant newspaper ad below notes the "special holiday bill" at the Central theatre would be shown at 2:30, 6:30, and 8:30 pm, but incorrectly states the film stars Noah Berry. In actuality, the film starred Noah Beery's younger brother, future Oscar winner Wallace Beery!


 

Happy Thanksgiving!

THE LEGAL STUFF: The Louise Brooks Society™ blog is authored by Thomas Gladysz, Director of the Louise Brooks Society  (www.pandorasbox.com). Original contents copyright © 2024. Further unauthorized use prohibited. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Friday, November 22, 2024

Louise Brooks-inspired thriller, The Haunting of Emily Pierson, now published

Scott R. Howe is a longtime fan of Louise Brooks, and a longtime supporter of the Louise Brooks Society. His novel, The Haunting of Emily Pierson, has just been published. The book is a revised and retitled version of his 2022 Louise Brooks-inspired thriller Pandora's Box. Scott is a good writer, and I am looking forward to checking out this new edition of what promises to be a terrorific novel.

The Haunting of Emily Pierson marks Scott R. Howe’s debut into the world of psychological horror. This gripping first novel blends psychological tension with supernatural dread, while promising to keep readers on the edge of their seats. And what's more, Louise Brooks is a central "character".

The book's description: 

"Emily thought she was running toward a fresh start when she left behind her job, her two-year relationship, and her old life, settling in a quiet apartment in Rochester, New York. But what was supposed to be a refuge quickly turns into something far more unsettling. The previous tenant, an elderly recluse and once silent film icon, died in this same apartment—and she hasn’t truly left.

Emily finds ever more disturbing connections with the woman. They seem to share a secret and she feels compelled to uncover it. The deeper she digs, the more the apartment’s chilling presence tightens its grip, making her question what is real and what lies hidden in the shadows.

In order to regain her peace, Emily must confront the unsettling truth that connects her to this haunting presence. However, there are certain secrets that are better left buried, and facing them may not only harm her and those she holds close, but also have far-reaching consequences.

A spine-tingling tale of psychological horror and the supernatural, The Haunting of Emily Pierson, will make you question what lingers in the spaces we call home."

An excerpt from the novel:

After a pause, Hazel said, “I’m so sorry, dear. I just realized that I haven’t told you who I’m talking about.” 

Emily shook her head, smiling politely.

“Well, if you were as old as I am, you’d probably know her by name or at the very least by that hair style she had when she was young.”

Hazel paused again. “Can you believe I used to care for a world-famous Hollywood film actress?”
Emily perked up a bit. Hazel’s reference to a once-famous person provided an intriguing twist to the mystery. 

“Please tell me you’ve heard of Charlie Chaplin or Greta Garbo, dear,” Hazel teased.

“Yes, of course, I’ve heard of them.”

“Well, the woman I’m referring to had affairs with both of ’em!”

Emily grabbed her laptop and pulled it closer.

"Who was it that used to live here?” asked Emily, opening her browser with her fingers poised, ready to type.

“Louise Brooks,” responded Hazel as she watched Emily type the search terms into the search bar. 

“Louise Brooks,” 1920s film actress…

Emily’s screen became filled with references and images, causing her to be transfixed. A black-and-white image of a woman from a bygone era stared back. She was incredibly beautiful, and her appearance seemed quite contemporary. The woman in the photos wore her jet-black hair in a bob, cut short, at her ears, with the dark pointed tips cutting into her alabaster cheeks, perfectly framing her dark, sultry eyes. The straight lines of her blunt bangs were the ideal accent to her stick-straight brows, and her perfect lips curved in just enough of a pout to seem sad yet inviting. 

Emily had no clue that women in the 1920s could look like this. The flappers she had seen in photographs from that era looked nothing like this woman. They wore their hair in curls, and they looked almost comical — like Betty Boop.

For Emily, the woman’s appearance was completely hypnotic. One image struck Emily’s eye. The faded picture of a little girl standing outside, next to a chair. Emily focused her concentration even more and clicked on the image, enlarging it to fill her laptop screen. Emily’s mind swirled. The little girl in the photograph looked like the young girl she had seen on Halloween night. Emily’s eyes moved down to the caption below the photo.

Louise Brooks, age 9, on the front porch of her family’s home in Cherryvale, Kansas, 1915.
“As I told you, dear, Louise Brooks hasn’t lived in this building for a very long time, and she died before you were even born.” Hazel surveyed the room, then added, “She lived here, in your apartment.”

 # # #

Scott R. Howe grew up in Sacramento, California, where he still resides. He spent his formative years watching horror and Sci-fi movies which eventually grew into a general interest in film history, early Hollywood — and a life-long obsession with the silent film actress, Louise Brooks. In addition, Scott has had an interest in the paranormal. Scott is also a graphic artist, painter, filmmaker and musician. More about the author and his new book can be found on his website at https://scottrhowe.com/ 

Back in 2022,  the Louise Brooks Society spoke with Howe about his original novel.

LOUISE BROOKS SOCIETY: When and how did you first come across Louise Brooks?

SCOTT HOWE: My earliest recollection is that I had purchased a sort of coffee table book on early, silent-era film making in Hollywood. It was filled with images from the turn of the century, up through the 1920s. When I was flipping through the pages, I stopped at a photo of this woman I had never come across before. She was striking to me, initially, because her look didn't seem to match anyone else in the entire photobook; in my eyes, she was a complete anachronism. I was in my mid-twenties at the time (this was like 1985 or '86) and she just really stood out as being uniquely attractive, even by 1980s standards. That was enough to intrigue me and I was off on a quest to find out as much as I could about her. That was before the internet so I found myself driving to Berkeley to make use of their libraries, etc. It became a fun side-hobby to sort of try and sleuth out information about her throughout the years. 

LOUISE BROOKS SOCIETY: What is it about her that draws you?

SCOTT HOWE: I sort of answered this in the first question. At first, it was that she appeared out of place in her own time. She seemed completely modern to me. The first book I found was her own book, the compilation of some of her essays that had appeared previously in other journals, "Lulu In Hollywood." Her writing felt as if I was reading the thoughts of a young twenty-year-old girl. That made her even more attractive. It was almost like I was falling in love with this "young" woman, and I guess I ignored the fact that she had actually passed, perhaps only a year earlier. (I hope this is making sense). Later, I found the Kenneth Tynan article on her, "The Girl in the Black Helmet." It felt good to know that I wasn't the only one who found himself falling in love with her.

LOUISE BROOKS SOCIETY: You have written a paranormal historical thriller. What are some of your favorite books or authors in that field?

SCOTT HOWE: One of the earliest books on the paranormal that I read as a teen was The Amityville Horror. The idea that this series of events may have actually happened completely fascinated me. I remember asking my mom to take me to the library so I could look for news stories, on microfiche, from the time of the original Defeo family murders; since the book mentioned that George Lutz, who moved into the house shortly after the murders with his family, held a striking resemblance to Ronald Defeo Jr., the one who killed his entire family, I wanted to see, for myself, if they did have a similar appearance  — and they did. It was also around this time, in the mid-seventies, that my older brother brought back a souvenir book he'd bought for me, from his visit to Washington D.C.. It was called Ghosts: Washington's Most Famous Ghost Stories by John Alexander. Reading that book, as a kid, led to my love for history in general.

LOUISE BROOKS SOCIETY: Do other early film stars or early films interest you? Or the Jazz Age?

SCOTT HOWE: I grew up on the Our Gang/Little Rascals shorts and Laurel and Hardy. They were a Saturday morning staple here in Sacramento when I was growing up. I found myself strangely mesmerized by the music in those Hal Roach comedies. For years, I tried to find information on that music. Eventually, in the late eighties, while I was working as an artist at Tower Records, I was able to discover the music of Beau Hunks where they recreated all of that old music from the Hal Roach films. I knew of Chaplin too, but did not grow to truly appreciate his genius until I got into college and took some film history courses. It wasn't until later that I discovered Chaplin's connection with Louise. I was also excited to learn that Buster Keaton shot Steamboat Bill, Jr. here in Sacramento right along the river, near what is now West Sacramento.

LOUISE BROOKS SOCIETY: How was it that you had the idea to blend your two interests - gothic thrillers and a certain silent film star?

SCOTT HOWE: I'm not sure if you can relate, but I've felt for a long time that I had an itch that needed to be scratched when it came to Louise Brooks. In college, I began my interest in film making and in film history. After my daughter was grown, I took up film making again and had the ridiculous idea to try and make a short film about Louise. I failed miserably, of course. All the while, I kept hoping someone else would do something. Anything. I still hope that someone, someday, will finally produce a biopic about her. But I digress… Over the pandemic, I had to have quadruple bypass surgery. While recovering from that, I started thinking about coming up with an idea for a novel that might use Louise as a framework. Initially, it felt too daunting a task. After all, people way more qualified — people like you — have already written so much about her; what could I possibly add to that? But my mind kept coming back to something about Louise that had always affected me. It was the fact that she was sexually abused as a child. I found it both heart-wrenching and chilling that this had happened to her at all — and that it was as common, then, as it is today — seemed unthinkable. One could see how much it changed the trajectory of her life forever after that experience. Barry Paris wrote in his famous biography on her that Mr. Flowers was her "Rosebud." It finally hit me that one way I could talk about all of that was to couch it within a ghost story. Good ghost stories, after all, are just mysteries wrapped up in a nice, scary package. Writing scary short films was always in my wheelhouse, so why not try writing something longer-form and see if I could manage it. As it turned out, this was the spark I needed to finally scratch that Louise Brooks itch that I'd had ever since I first discovered her for myself. I think it's natural for creative people to get inspiration from their muses. Louise has been that for me. I've drawn her, painted her, tried to make a short film about her... and now, I've finally found a way to express some of my thoughts about something that truly hurt me when I first learned of Louise’s sexual abuse as a child.

LOUISE BROOKS SOCIETY: What might you want readers of your book to know?

SCOTT HOWE: I hope people will understand that I wrote this book with a deep admiration and affection for Louise Brooks. Those who have done their own research on Louise will no doubt recognize some familiar acknowledgements to her in the form of small factoids about her life that I sprinkled throughout this book. Finally, I hope that by delving deeper into the issue of sexual abuse, readers will gain a better understanding of the strength of will required to survive such trauma. I'm left to wonder how much more Louise would have achieved had she not had to carry such a burden with her over her lifetime.
 
I have to apologize for my lengthy responses. Once I get going, I can't stop. :)

# # #

THE LEGAL STUFF: The Louise Brooks Society™ blog is authored by Thomas Gladysz, Director of the Louise Brooks Society  (www.pandorasbox.com). Original contents copyright © 2024. Further unauthorized use prohibited. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Louise Brooks and Pandorina skrinjica (Pandora's Box) in Slovenia

Longtime Louise Brooks Society supporter Camille Scaysbrook alerted me to this November 9th screening of Pandorina skrinjica (Pandora's Box) at the Slovenska Kinoteca in Delavska Zbornica, Slovenia. Thank you Camille!

Scaysbrook, a member of the LBS since before 2000, posted on Bluesky that her parents were recently in Slovenia and came across a program for the Slovenska Kinoteka which featured Louise Brooks on the cover!

The film institute screened Pandora's Box as part of a series devoted to "Scandalous Classics of German Silent Film." Camille also sent snapshots of two of the interior pages highlighting the event. I will soon add the cover shot to the Louise Brooks Society archive age which features a bunch of contemporary film program covers (dating back to 1961). That page can be found HERE.

More about the Slovenska Kinoteka screening can be found HERE. And more about the film can be found HERE. IF THERE ARE ANY SLOVENIA FANS WHO ATTENDED THIS SCREENING, I WOULD LOVE TO HEAR FROM YOU. These first of these non-English / Slovenian pages state: 

Lepa in muhasta Lulu (Louise Brooks), brezskrbna in nedolžno perverzna, je bitje, ki živi le za ljubezen. Nastopa v revijalni predstavi, ki jo sponzorira njen ljubimec Ludwig Schön (Fritz Kortner), mogočen časopisni in varietejski magnat, ki je zaročen s hčerjo ministra za notranje zadeve. Na večer premiere Lulu prisili Schöna, da zaroko razdre in se poroči z njo.

Pandorina skrinjica je osnovana na dveh dramah nemškega dramatika Franka Wedekinda: Duh zemlje (1895) in Pandorina skrinjica (1902), ki so ju imeli v takratnem času za nemoralni in sta povzročili škandal. Tako je komajda presenetljivo, da so Pabstov film, ko je prišel v kinematografe, prepovedali skoraj v vseh evropskih državah, razen v Franciji, kjer pa so cenzorji zapovedali precejšnje reze, ki so privedli do omiljene različice filma.

In English translation via Google translate, it reads:

Beautiful and whimsical, Lulu (Louise Brooks), carefree and innocently perverse, is a creature who lives only for love. She appears in a revue sponsored by her lover Ludwig Schön (Fritz Kortner), a powerful newspaper and variety magnate who is engaged to the daughter of the Minister of the Interior. On the night of the premiere, Lulu forces Schön to break off the engagement and marry her. 

Pandora's Box is based on two plays by German playwright Frank Wedekind: The Spirit of the Earth (1895) and Pandora's Box (1902), which were considered immoral at the time and caused a scandal. It is therefore hardly surprising that when Pabst's film was released in cinemas, it was banned in almost all European countries, except in France, where censors ordered significant cuts, resulting in a watered-down version of the film.

The second of these non-English pages state:

Film Pandorina skrinjica (Die Büchse der Pandora), ki ga je leta 1929 režiral avstrijski filmski ustvarjalec Georg Wilhelm Pabst, velja za enega od vrhuncev nemškega nemega ekspresionizma in za enega najbolj kontroverznih ter odmevnih filmov svojega časa. Osnovan je na dveh dramah Franka Wedekinda, Duhu zemlje (1895) in Pandorini skrinjici (1902), ki sta bili v času nastanka označeni za nemoralni in škandalozni, in prinaša kompleksno zgodbo o vzponu in padcu usodne ženske, katere fatalna privlačnost prinese propad tako njej kot ljudem v njeni bližini.

Glavno junakinjo Lulu upodablja karizmatična Louise Brooks, z nenavadno kombinacijo otroške nedolžnosti in seksapila obdarjena igralka, ki je revolucionirala filmsko igro s svojo naravno prezenco in izraznim minimalizmom, tako drugačnim od teatralne igre, značilne za takratne neme filme. Zgodba sledi Lulujinemu vplivu na moške in ženske okoli sebe ter prikazuje, kako jo njena frivolnost in spolna neinhibiranost zlagoma vlečeta v tragedijo. Lulu je svobodomiselna, neukrotljiva in izzivalna, to pa so lastnosti, ki jih družba tistega časa ni bila pripravljena sprejeti. Pabst skozi njeno zgodbo raziskuje teme spolne osvoboditve, moči ženske seksualnosti in destruktivne sile, ki jo ta lahko povzroči, ko se sreča z represivnimi družbenimi normami. Pripoved se začne z Lulujinimi ljubezenskimi zapleti in se postopoma poglablja v vse bolj temačne in uničujoče situacije, vse do tragičnega konca, ko postane žrtev Jacka Razparača.

Pabst je v sodelovanju s snemalcem Fritzom Arnom Wagnerjem ustvaril osupljivo vizualno podobo, polno bogatih kontrastov, temačnih senc in prefinjenih podrobnosti, ki poudarjajo psihološko globino likov in ustvarjajo mračno, skoraj nihilistično atmosfero. Poleg ekspresionističnih prijemov pa je film znan tudi po naturalističnih elementih, ki poskrbijo za realistično upodobitev človekovih strasti in propada.

Ob izidu je bil film zaradi svoje seksualne eksplicitnosti in moralne oporečnosti deležen večinoma negativnih kritik. Kjer so ga predvajali, je bil močno cenzuriran, marsikje pa je bil v celoti prepovedan. A sčasoma je postal predmet številnih filmskih analiz in navdih za prihodnje filmske ustvarjalce. Njegov vpliv lahko zaznamo v kasnejših filmskih delih, ki raziskujejo teme usodnih žensk, seksualne politike in temnih plati človeške narave.

I am not sure about the reference to cinematographer Fritz Arn Wagner. The creditted cameraman is usually given as Gunther Krampf. In English translation the above text reads:

Pandora's Box (Die Büchse der Pandora), directed by Austrian filmmaker Georg Wilhelm Pabst in 1929, is considered one of the pinnacles of German silent expressionism and one of the most controversial and high-profile films of its time. Based on two plays by Frank Wedekind, The Spirit of the Earth (1895) and Pandora's Box (1902), which were considered immoral and scandalous at the time of their creation, it tells the complex story of the rise and fall of a femme fatale whose fatal attraction brings ruin to both her and those around her. 
 
The main character, Lulu, is portrayed by the charismatic Louise Brooks, an actress gifted with an unusual combination of childlike innocence and sex appeal, who revolutionized film acting with her natural presence and expressive minimalism, so different from the theatrical acting typical of silent films of the time. The story follows Lulu's influence on the men and women around her, and shows how her frivolity and sexual uninhibition gradually lead her into tragedy. Lulu is free-spirited, untamed, and provocative, traits that society at the time was unwilling to accept. Through her story, Pabst explores themes of sexual liberation, the power of female sexuality, and the destructive force it can create when it encounters repressive social norms. The story begins with Lulu's love affairs and gradually delves into increasingly dark and destructive situations, until the tragic end when she falls victim to Jack the Ripper. 
 
Pabst, in collaboration with cinematographer Fritz Arn Wagner, created a stunning visual image, full of rich contrasts, dark shadows, and sophisticated details that emphasize the psychological depth of the characters and create a gloomy, almost nihilistic atmosphere. In addition to its expressionistic approaches, the film is also known for its naturalistic elements, which provide a realistic depiction of human passions and downfall. 
 
Upon its release, the film received mostly negative reviews due to its sexual explicitness and moral objections. Where it was shown, it was heavily censored, and in many places it was banned altogether. However, it has become the subject of numerous film analyses and an inspiration for future filmmakers. Its influence can be seen in later films that explore themes of femme fatale, sexual politics, and the dark side of human nature.

More about Louise Brooks can be found on the newly revamped Louise Brooks Society website at www.pandorasbox.com

THE LEGAL STUFF: The Louise Brooks Society™ blog is authored by Thomas Gladysz, Director of the Louise Brooks Society  (www.pandorasbox.com). Original contents copyright © 2024. Further unauthorized use prohibited. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Thursday, November 14, 2024

Happy birthday Louise Brooks (1906 - 1985)

Happy birthday to Louise Brooks, who was born on this day, November 14, in Cherryvale, Kansas in 1906.

Though I am not sure when, Louise was seemingly born in the very early hours of  November 14th -- which was a Wednesday. I say that because her birth made news on the very day she was born. Small articles about the birth appeared in both of her hometown newspapers on November 14. The first image shown below comes from the Cherryvale Daily Republican. It is followed by another clipping, from the Cherryvale Daily News, which appeared that same day on the newspaper's front page. As most Brooks' fans likely know, Brooks' father was a lawyer.


And just a few years later, the young little Mary Louise was photographed celebrating her birthday....

Louise Brooks grew-up and became a dancer, silent film star and eventually a writer. And the world, as is said, has never been the same. Here is a very early newspaper clipping celebrating her achievement. If you haven't watched a Louise Brooks film in a while, go ahead and watch one today...

More about Louise Brooks can be found on the newly revamped Louise Brooks Society website at www.pandorasbox.com

THE LEGAL STUFF: The Louise Brooks Society™ blog is authored by Thomas Gladysz, Director of the Louise Brooks Society  (www.pandorasbox.com). Original contents copyright © 2024. Further unauthorized use prohibited. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Tuesday, November 12, 2024

The City Gone Wild, featuring Louise Brooks, was released on this day in 1927

The City Gone Wild, featuring Louise Brooks, was released on this day in 1927. The film is a terse crime drama -- with gangsters, gangs, and gunfights, in which a criminal lawyer turns prosecutor to avenge the death of a friend. As she did in The Street of Forgotten Men, Louise Brooks plays a moll, this time the deliciously named Snuggles Joy, the “gunman’s honey.”

More about the film can be found on the Louise Brooks Society website filmography page.

The “gangster film” (as we know it today) more-or-less began with Paramount’s Underworld (1927). Though there were earlier crime films, the Joseph von Sternberg directed Underworld set the tone for many of the genre films which followed, namely Little Caesar (1931), The Public Enemy (1931), and Scarface (1932).

With the surprising success of Underworld, Paramount quickly put another gangster film into production, namely The City Gone Wild. The film was a vehicle for leading man Thomas Meighan, who in 1927 saw his star begining to fade. To boost his career, Paramount paired Meighan with a topical story “ripped from the headlines,” a first rate director, and popular supporting actors. Also assigned to The City Gone Wild were individuals who worked on Underworld, namely writer Charles Furthman, cinematographer Bert Glennon, and tough-guy actor Fred Kohler.

The two films, not surprisingly, were sometimes compared. Intoning the slang of the time, Variety wrote, “The gang stuff is a la Underworld — machine guns and plenty tough. The two main yeggs each have a moll carrying their gat in the pocketbook. Very authentic in these little details ….”

Many critics focused on the acting and actors. The noted critic Ward M. Marsh of the Cleveland Plain Dealer stated, ” . . . pitting her against crookdom’s love of Louise Brooks brings out the worst in all of us. On the credit side is Miss Brooks and also Fred Kohler in a role paralleling his Mulligan in Underworld. They do excellent work.” The San Antonio Express echoed Marsh, “Although Meighan is featured in the cast, he has his co-stars, Louise Brooks, one of Paramount’s niftiest, and Fred Kohler, remembered for his great crook work in Rough Riders and Underworld.”

Critics noticed Brooks’ hard-boiled character, and the edge she brought to the role. Radie Harris of the New York Morning Telegraph wrote, “Louise Brooks is in the cast and that is something to grow ecstatic about. Christened with the preposterous name of Snuggles Joy, she is the most entrancing crook that ever pulled a Holt. No wonder the city went wild.”

“Another distinct ornament of the cast is Louise Brooks, who lends considerable vividness to her portrait of a lady of the underworld. In fact, she gives so good an interpretation of the part that Marietta Millner, supposedly the feminine lead, actually relapses into only secondary importance,” wrote Gordon Hillman of the Boston Daily Advertiser.

Brooks was so good that she out shown Millner, who had appeared earlier in the year with Meighan in the Cruze directed film We’re All Gamblers. “Louise Brooks, who plays the crook’s girl, is better looking, more attractive and a better actress than Marietta Millner, the district attorney’s jeune fille, and in real life Tommy probably would have preferred her to Marietta,” wrote Stanley Orne in the Portland Oregonian. “Louise Brooks, the pert flapper, completely shadows the more important role allotted to Marietta Millner, and the ‘girl of Gunner Gallagher’ brief as her part is, is a far more intriguing character than the society girl of Miss Millner,” added Leona Pollack of the Omaha World Herald.


Under its American title, documented screenings of the film took place in Australia (including Tasmania), Bermuda, Canada,* China, Dutch Guiana (Suriname), Hong Kong, Indonesia, Ireland, Jamaica, Japan, New Zealand, South Africa, Sweden, and the United Kingdom** (England, Isle of Man, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales). The film was occasionally shown in the United States as City Gone Wild  (and at least once in Scotland under the title A City Gone Wild). In the United States, the film was also presented under the title A Cidade que Enlouqueceu (Portuguese-language press).

Elsewhere, The City Gone Wild was shown under the title The City Gone Mad and La ciudad del mal (Argentina); Der Verbrecherkönig von Chicago (Austria); La cité maudite (Belgium, in French) and De Vervloekte Stad (Belgium, in Dutch); A cidade buliçosa (Brazil); La ciudad del mal (Chile); La ciudad del mal (Costa Rica); Mesto uplynulý divoký (Czechoslovakia); Storhyens Svøbe and Storstadens Svøbe! (Denmark); Het Kwaad eener Wereldstad (Dutch East Indies – Indonesia); La Ville Maudite (Egypt); La Ville Maudite (France); Gonosztevők királya (Hungary);  狂乱街 or Kyōran-gai (Japan); Die Gottin der Sunde (Latvia); La onda del crimen (Mexico); Boeven en Burgers and Het Zondagskindand Het Kwaad Eener Wereldstad (The Netherlands***); Piraci Wielkiego Miasta (Poland); A Cidade Ruidosa (Portugal); Gonosztevok kiralya (Romania); La ciudad del mal (Spain); and La Cité Maudite (Switzerland).

* Except in Quebec, where the film was banned due to “too much shooting.”
** When the film was shown in The United Kingdom, it was restricted to adults only.
*** When the film was shown in The Netherlands in 1929-1930 and again in 1934, audiences were limited to those 18 years and older.

SOME THINGS ABOUT THE FILM YOU MAY NOT KNOW:

— Thomas Meighan, the star of the film, was Louise Brooks’ “uncle-in-law.” (Meighan was married to Frances Ring, a Broadway stage actress and the sister of the popular entertainer Blanche Ring. Director Eddie Sutherland — Brooks’ husband at the time, was the nephew of both Meighan, as Sutherland’s mother, Julie, was a sister of Blanche and Frances Ring.)

— Meighan was involved in two of the more sensational happenings of the silent era. In 1916, he was the sole witness to Jack Pickford and Olive Thomas’ secretive wedding. And in 1923, Meighan put up a large chunk of the bail money, and with the help of June Mathis and George Melford, got Rudolph Valentino out of jail after he was charged with bigamy.

— In the mid-1920s, Meighan became interested in Florida real estate after talking with his brother, who was a realtor. In 1925, Meighan bought property in Ocala, Florida (where scenes for the Eddie Sutherland-directed It’s the Old Army Game were shot). In 1927, he built a home in New Port Richey, Florida. It was there that he spent his winters and helped support a local movie theater, the Meighan Theatre, which was named in his honor. The Meighan Theatre opened July 1, 1926, with a showing of the Meighan movie The New Klondike, a film set against the backdrop of the Florida land boom of the 1920s. Today, the renamed Richey Suncoast Theater is home to the annual Thomas Meighan film festival.

— Brooks never learned to drive an automobile. According to the actress, a double was employed when her character was needed to speed away in a car.

More about The City Gone Wild can be found on the newly revamped Louise Brooks Society website on its The City Gone Wild (filmography page).

THE LEGAL STUFF: The Louise Brooks Society™ blog is authored by Thomas Gladysz, Director of the Louise Brooks Society  (www.pandorasbox.com). Original contents copyright © 2024. Further unauthorized use prohibited. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Saturday, November 9, 2024

The many visitors to the Louise Brooks Society website

Wow, how interesting it is to view my visitor log and stats -  the country of origin, the DNS record, the made-up usernames.... One never knew Louise Brooks had so many anonymous fans in Ireland, and Singapore, too, for that matter. Where do they all come from -- such a crowd! I am pleased that my site software and my premium security software is keeping track. One never knows when I might want to review these stats.

Well, anyways, the Louise Brooks Society continues to grow, and thrive. As of today, the LBS website has more than 250 pages of content -- and that's not counting the near 3,700 blog posts here on blogger. Here are some new and recent pages worth checking out:

Louise Brooks at the Cafe de Paris in London

Caricatures and Illustrations

"Quotable" Louise Brooks

Coming Attraction Slides

Brooks and Company

Stagnant websites are a bore. That's why I am always adding new pages, or tweaking, editing and refining old ones. YOU are invited to check out the newly improved Louise Brooks Society website at www.pandorasbox.com

THE LEGAL STUFF: The Louise Brooks Society™ blog is authored by Thomas Gladysz, Director of the Louise Brooks Society  (www.pandorasbox.com). Original contents copyright © 2024. Further unauthorized use prohibited. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Wednesday, November 6, 2024

Notes on the new Criterion release of Pandora's Box, starring Louise Brooks

As most Louise Brooks and silent film fans likely know, Criterion has recently released Pandora's Box on DVD and Blu-ray. That's great news. This new release is a slightly repackaged version of their 2006 release of the film, which has been out-of-print for more than a few years and today is much sought after. There are, however, a few key differences.

More information about this new release can be found on the Criterion website HERE. And for those interested, the DVD and the Blu-ray releases are also available on Amazon. BOTH ARE ON SALE NOW!

So, what's the difference? And if you have the earlier release, should you buy this new version? That all depends....

First, the differences between the 2006 and the 2024 releases in regards to the film itself:

The 2006 Criterion release features a then "New, restored high-definition digital transfer of the definitive Munich Film Museum restoration." It runs 133 minutes.

The 2024 Criterion release features a "new 2k digital restoration." It runs 141 minutes. This 2k restoration was created from three duplicate elements from the collections of the Cinematheque francaise, Gosfilmofond and Narodni filmovy archiv. Funded by Hugh Hefner, this restoration was a collaboration between the George Eastman Museum, Cinematheque francaise, Cineteca di Bologna, Narodni filmovy archiv, and the Deutsche Kinemathek - Museumfur Film und Fernsehen. The restoration supervisor was Martin Koerber. (Unless I am mistaken, this restoration is the same as appeared on the recent Eureka release of the film from the U.K. However, I am uncertain as to why that version is said to run 133 minutes while this release runs 141 minutes. Perhaps someone from Criterion could explain.)

Second, differences between the bonus material included on each release:

The 2006 Criterion release features a number of excellent bonus materials or "supplements", including 

-- Four musical scores, by Gillian Anderson, Dimitar Pentchev, Peer Raben, and Stéphan Oliva

-- "New and improved English subtitle translation"

-- Audio commentary by film scholars Thomas Elsaesser and Mary Ann Doane 

-- Louise Brooks: Looking for Lulu (1998), a documentary by Hugh Munro Neely

-- Lulu in Berlin (1971), a rare interview with actor Louise Brooks, by Richard Leacock and Susan Steinberg Woll

-- Video interviews with Leacock and Michael Pabst, director G. W. Pabst’s son

-- A thick booklet which contains an essay by critic J. Hoberman, notes on the scores, Kenneth Tynan’s 1979 “The Girl in the Black Helmet,” and an article by Louise Brooks ("Pabst and Lulu") on her relationship with the Director

-- Stills Gallery

The 2024 Criterion release features each of the above mention bonus materials EXCEPT:

-- The stills gallery is lacking from both versions (DVD and Blu-ray) of the new release

-- Also of note, the booklet accompanying the Blu-ray contains the introductory essay by Hoberman, notes on the scores, Tynan’s 1979 “The Girl in the Black Helmet,” and an article by Brooks ("Pabst and Lulu"), while the slim insert accompanying the DVD contains only Hoberman's introductory essay and the notes on the scores while dropping the Tynan and Brooks essays. I wonder why?

-- Notably, the 2024 Blu-ray release is one disc, while the DVD is a two-disc set

-- The 2024 release has a new cover by Eric Skillman, as well as an official trailer announcing this 2024 release (which, now that it has been released, is dated; see below)

-- The interior illustrations are seemingly the same, though there are fewer of them on the DVD version

-- And though it is not explicitly stated, I assume the "New and improved English subtitle translation" has been carried over from the 2006 release.

There haven't been many reviews of this new release, that I have noticed. One of them, on the Slant magazine website, is cursory. Here is another, on the YouTube channel, Let's Talk Criterion

With all that said, I am glad Criterion brought Pandora's Box back into print. Perhaps a few more fans will check it out. Also, as I mentioned in some of my earlier blogs on the Criterion and Eureka releases, including my Pop Matters review from earlier this year, the Hugh Hefner funded restoration (supervised by Martin Koerber) is likely the best version of Pandora's Box that we will see in our lifetime.

For more about Pandora's Box, see the newly revamped Pandora's Box filmography page on the new revamped Louise Brooks Society website.

THE LEGAL STUFF: The Louise Brooks Society™ blog is authored by Thomas Gladysz, Director of the Louise Brooks Society  (www.pandorasbox.com). Original contents copyright © 2024. Further unauthorized use prohibited. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
Powered By Blogger