Wednesday, August 5, 2026

Louise Brooks and a role in The Odyssey, what might have been

A speculation about what might have been . . . . It's well known that G. W. Pabst wanted to work with Louise Brooks once more after having starred her in two films released in 1929, Pandora's Box and Diary of a Lost Girl. Today, both are considered silent masterpieces.

According to Brooks, Pabst hoped to cast the actress in A Modern Hero (1934), a Warner Bros. release about an ambitious circus worker with an Oedipus complex (played by Richard Barthelmess) who climbs to the top by exploiting his friends, business partners and most significantly, the women in his life. Brooks' role in the film never came about, despite Pabst seemingly pitching the then out of work actress to studio executives by providing them with a copy of Pandora's Box. (see previous post)

[BTW: A Modern Hero is available on DVD from the Warner Bros. Archive Collection. As far as films from the 1930s are concerned, it is a good film, and well worth watching. Get a copy and complete of your Pabst collection. And try and guess which role Brooks would have been cast in.... I think I know.]

One year later, in 1935, Pabst hoped to make a version of Faust which would star Greta Garbo as Gretchen and Brooks as Helen of Troy! Unfortunately, the German director was unable to raise funds  for the project. Just imagine!

In 1950, Pabst returned to the United States with another film project in mind - a film based on the Odyssey of Homer. According to an article by Herman Weinberg published in the New York Times

"No list of the ten directors who most shaped the language of the film and contributed importantly to it would be complete without the name of G. W. Pabst. . . . [The first of his two current projects] is the much-heralded Odyssey of Homer, to be filmed in Italy with, if possible, Garbo as both Penelope and Circe. He would like to get Clark Gable or Orson Welles as Ulysses. . . ."

That project never came about either.... 

But then, in 1954, work began on a film that would be realized and released -- Ulysses, a fantasy adventure film based on Homer's epic poem. It was an international co-production between Italy, France, and the United States produced by Dino De Laurentiis and Carlo Ponti. The film, when released, starred Kirk Douglas in the title role, Silvana Mangano in a dual role as Penelope and Circe, and Anthony Quinn as Antinous. 

This version was originally planned to be shot in 3D, and the original choice for director was none other than G.W. Pabst ----- but he quit the project at the last minute. I don't know that Pabst would have cast Brooks in a supporting role had he stayed with the project; perhaps Pabst would have cast Brooks as a siren or witch. Would Brooks have accepted ? Who knows? Would she have been capable of acting in a film at that time in her life? Possibly....

[Interestingly, there is a bit of overlap with the 1954 Ulysses and Brooks' earlier career. The film's cinematographer was none other then multi-Academy Award winner Harold Rosson, whose credits include two Brooks' films, The Street of Forgotten Men (1925) and Evening Clothes (1927).]

Had Pabst directed the 1954 version of Ulysses, and had Brooks had a role in it, the world as we know it would have been a different place. But such is the will of the gods....


 THE LEGAL STUFF: The Louise Brooks Society™ blog is authored by Thomas Gladysz, Director of the Louise Brooks Society  (www.pandorasbox.com). Original content copyright © 2026. Further unauthorized use prohibited. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.   

Monday, August 3, 2026

Whatever Happened to .... a missing print of Pandora's Box, starring Louise Brooks

Of late, I have been going through a few different archives and uncovering some rather remarkable material. There are things I didn't know (which ain't saying much), things not mentioned in the Barry Paris biography (which is saying a lot), and things I don't think anyone knows about (wowza). Here is one example, a handwritten note by Louise Brooks likely dating from the 1960s or 1970s. It reads 

"1934 - When Pabst was under contract to Warners - he got them a print of Lulu, hoping to get me for A Modern Hero -
1943 - this was the print Iris Barry at MOMA saw and decided not to buy Lulu because 'it was not of lasting interest'."
 

Brooks' note suggests in no uncertain terms Warner Bros obtained a copy of Pandora's Box back in 1934, and still had it nine years later, in 1943.
 
How Brooks knew Pabst supplied a print to Warners I can't say, but I know that she was in touch with Pabst in 1934 around the time of A Modern Hero (which Pabst made in Hollywood), and may have been told then. 

I wonder what ever happened to that vintage print. I wondered if it still exists, shelved and forgotten in the Warner's vault? Who would think to look for that film where it shouldn't be?
 
I emailed a couple of individuals to try and find out. I wrote to Martin Koerber, who has long been involved in the restoration of Pandora's Box. He said, "I am not aware of an original print of LULU in any archive in the US, even though I looked everywhere in 1996/7 when we made the search for the Berlinale retrospective and a restoration campaign for those films that needed it".
 
Regarding another early Pabst film, Koerber stated, "Warner Bros definitely had original prints of THE THREEPENNY OPERA back in 1997 when we searched for material everywhere. Could be that they were at, or later went to UCLA, because Warner probably didn’t want nitrate on the lot. I thought at the time that this had to do with the fact that they co-produced this film with NERO."
 
I also emailed George Feltenstein at Warners, who wrote "we have no record of any print of that film ever being at the studio. That said, documentation for such an unusual set of circumstances may not have survived in the intervening decades. All of our nitrate holdings, including prints have been on deposit at UCLA since 1979. There is no record of a print of that film being part of that deposit. It’s theoretically possible that the studio might have repatriated the print in the years after the end of WWII, but this is just a hypothesis."
 
The mystery continues.... Whatever happened to that vintage print of Pandora's Box? Where might it be hiding?
 
 
THE LEGAL STUFF: The Louise Brooks Society™ blog is authored by Thomas Gladysz, Director of the Louise Brooks Society  (www.pandorasbox.com). Original content copyright © 2026. Further unauthorized use prohibited. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.     

Friday, July 31, 2026

Submit Louise Brooks' films for the 2026 National Film Registry

Submit Louise Brooks' films (and others) for the 2026 National Film Registry. The Louise Brooks Society suggests these American films.

Beggars of Life (1928) -- Americana a la hobo mode & William Wellman's favorite of his silent films

The Show-Off (1926) -- based on the classic George Kelly play, remade multiple times as a film 

Love Em and Leave Em (1926) -- a 'swonderful flapper rom-com set during the Roaring 20s

The Street of Forgotten Men (1925) --  one of the first "gangs of New York"

The deadline is August 15th

Begin the simple submission form HERE (at https://www.research.net/r/national-fim-registry-nomination-form)


 



THE LEGAL STUFF: The Louise Brooks Society™ blog is authored by Thomas Gladysz, Director of the Louise Brooks Society  (www.pandorasbox.com). Original content copyright © 2026. Further unauthorized use prohibited. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. 
  

Wednesday, July 29, 2026

Away with Words - a NEW silent film featuring Louise Brooks

To contemporary audiences, the silent films of the past may well require a kind of suspension of disbelief in order to come to terms with them as both as works of art as well as the gone world from which they sprang. That's true for Away with Words, a new silent production "starring" Louise Brooks. It is a joyful must watch for any fan of the actress, or of silent film.

Made from original and archival footage, Away with Words tells the story of Abel Lively, a lonely dreamer obsessed with Brooks who must come to terms with the too-safe bubble of his imagination. Set in London around 1931, Abel Lively is broke, alone, and terrified of going outside his one-man film studio -- and he couldn't be happier in not doing so. When his life is upended by a chance encounter with Penelope Peabody -- an unemployed painter with a taste for lock picking (played by the charming Jessica Still), Abel will have to choose between two worlds, the one in his head, and the one in which he has a chance at real love. 

Away with Words (Reshoot Productions, 2026) is the work of Sam Pothier, a U.K. filmmaker who wrote, edited, co-directed, co-produced and stars (as Abel Lively) in this quite clever romantic comedy-drama which also happens to be a silent movie. As anyone who has watched silent films will realize, Away with Words is indebted to the poetic logic of the silent era. It also leans into the dream-logic premise of Buster Keaton's Sherlock Jr. Wallace Beery (as Oklahoma Red) and Edward G. Robinson (as Caesar) feature in "supporting" roles.

However, it is Louise Brooks (as Lulu) who is the focus of Away with Words. Most all the footage of Brooks comes from Beggars of Life (by far the most-used archival source at a little over eight minutes worth), as well as her two German movies from 1929, Pandora’s Box (just under five minutes) and Diary of a Lost Girl (just under two minutes). There is also a bit of It's the Old Army Game, and plenty of Brooks’ imagery in the form of photos and posters.


As Pothier stated, there are Easter eggs for silent movie enthusiasts, including a scene that merges footage from a Charlie Chaplin film and a Harold Lloyd film, along with three Buster Keaton cameos. All together, there is footage from some 30 silent and early sound films as well as six public domain Betty Boop shorts. All are credited at the film's end. 

It is also worth noting that nothing in this 99 minute film is A.I.-generated. Pothier and co-director / co-producer Husam Taha (who also served as the cinematographer) used lots and lots and lots of effects, but they're all of the "traditional kind" and all done by the two filmmakers. And what's more, these many effects are practically seamless to those in the right frame of mind, or in other words, those who suspend their disbelief. The inter-titles are likewise well presented. And a shout-out to Andrew Cowie, who has composed an exceptional and appropriate piano score. Away with Words is greatly enhanced by his accompaniment. Bravo future maestro!

Away with Words is available to stream on Amazon Prime in the United States and other parts of the world, including the United Kingdom, Australia and some countries in Europe. It can also be viewed on Google Play and YouTube. Screenings in England are in the works. More about the film can be found at its website and its IMDb page.

If pastiche can be art, even high art -- then Away with Words is a near masterpiece. 

THE LEGAL STUFF: The Louise Brooks Society™ blog is authored by Thomas Gladysz, Director of the Louise Brooks Society  (www.pandorasbox.com). Original content copyright © 2026. Further unauthorized use prohibited. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.  

Thursday, July 23, 2026

Writings of Louise Brooks page updated

The "Writings of Louise Brooks" page on the Louise Brooks Society website has been significantly updated. This page includes Brooks' essays and letters, as well as statements and other miscellaneous literary efforts. If you have read Lulu in Hollywood and think you know Brooks' writings (either published or unpublished), this page will likely prove a revelation. 

quoted in Billboard in September, 1925
 
Included among the latest entries on this updated page are these:

"Louise Brooks, in a letter to Pauline Kael, dated 26 May 1962--." Psychological Masterpieces : G.W. Pabst's Pandora's Box, UCLA Committee on Fine Art Productions, 1962. 
--- one page statement, which according to the series' prospectus, "Miss Brooks has sent us her impressions of the role of Lulu, for use as program notes for this presentation." 

"The Influence of Movie Stars on the Freedom of Women." April 12, 1963.
--- feminist-themed speech delivered to the Catholic Women's Clubs of Rochester; presumed lost 

"Malcolm St. Clair," unpublished manuscript, January - February 1966. 
--- approximately 25 page typescript manuscript additionally annotated by hand - marked "First draft"

"The Mystery of Mal St. Clair." unpublished manuscript, February 1968.
--- approximately 25 page typescript manuscript additionally annotated by hand; this piece is distinct from the above mentioned work

"A Corrected View of Howard Hawks" undated 
-- a very brief fragment survives, which suggests Brooks started or envisioned a longer essay 


Do you have a second draft copy of Brooks' long lost novel, Naked on My Goat, sitting in your desk drawer? If so, send me a copy!

THE LEGAL STUFF: The Louise Brooks Society™ blog is authored by Thomas Gladysz, Director of the Louise Brooks Society  (www.pandorasbox.com). Original content copyright © 2026. Further unauthorized use prohibited. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. 

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Louise Brooks got married 100 years ago today

One hundred years ago today -- on July 21, 1926 -- Louise Brooks married director Eddie Sutherland in New York City; the ceremony was performed by Deputy Clerk William McCormick at the city’s Municipal Building. Brooks and Sutherland met earlier in the year during the filming It's the Old Army Game. Sutherland was the film's director. 


This was big news in movie circles. Articles appeared in many American newspapers, as well as on the front page of the New York Daily News the following day. 


And here is the page 31 article with all the details.


And a page two piece from earlier in the day (prior to the newspaper's final edition).

Of course, things didn't work out and the two filed for divorce a couple of years a later....

THE LEGAL STUFF: The Louise Brooks Society™ blog is authored by Thomas Gladysz, Director of the Louise Brooks Society  (www.pandorasbox.com). Original content copyright © 2026. Further unauthorized use prohibited. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. 

Thursday, July 16, 2026

“Funny Screen Experiences” by Louise Brooks

About one-hundred years ago today (depending on where you lived), American newspapers ran a syndicated piece attributed to Louise Brooks titled "Funny Screen Experiences," or "My Funniest Experience". One instance of this piece (shown below) was found in the Berkeley (California) Daily Gazette, where it was published on July 16, 1926. Another instance of this same article, under the title "My Funniest Experience", appeared in the San Francisco Bulletin on the same day.

Whatever it was titled, it also appeared on or around the same day in newspapers in Springfield, Massachusetts (7-14-26), San Antonio, Texas (7-16-26), Hammond, Indiana (7-20-26), Richmond, California (7-26-26), and elsewhere, including St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada (7-16-26) .

 
  

"Funny Screen Experiences" or  "My Funniest Experience" was a short-lived series of humorous anecdotes syndicated to various American newspapers by United Press, a wire service. The first piece in the series was attributed to Warner Baxter, and carried an editor's note which read, "This is the first in the series of brief stories by well known film stars, describing their most amusing studio experiences." Other pieces in the series appeared in July 1926 with a by-line attributed to Neil Hamilton (Beau Geste), Lois Wilson (The Great Gatsby), William Powell (Aloma of the South Seas), Renee Adoree (The Eternal Struggle), Aileen Pringle (Tin Gods) and Hale Hamilton. [I believe these are all Paramount productions.] Notably, the piece attributed to Ford Sterling also concerned The Show-Off

It is doubtful that Louise Brooks actually wrote her piece, despite the fact it has her by-line. Rather, the author of this piece was likely a Paramount publicist assigned to The Show-Off whose job it was to generate copy for newspapers which would, in turn, draw attention to Paramount’s new and forthcoming releases. The most than can be said about its authenticity is that it may have been based on an actual incident in which the set of The Show-Off was dressed with inappropriate books. It is also worth mentioning that Brooks was known to pass the time on set reading.

A variant instance of this same piece appeared in the Utica (NY) Observer Dispatch on July 18, 1926 under the title, "Light Reading Nearly Spoiled Flapper Scene: My Funniest Experience." 


 More about these and other spurious articles can be found on the Louise Brooks Society website page "Articles Attributed to Louise Brooks." 

THE LEGAL STUFF: The Louise Brooks Society™ blog is authored by Thomas Gladysz, Director of the Louise Brooks Society  (www.pandorasbox.com). Original content copyright © 2026. Further unauthorized use prohibited. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.  

Monday, July 13, 2026

Cinemages 3 : Six Talks on G. W. Pabst - a new acquisition -

For years, I have been hoping to acquire a copy of Cinemages 3 : Six Talks on G. W. Pabst. And now at last, I have done so. It is an obscure film journal published in New York City in 1955 by the Group for Film Study. The journal was edited by Gideon Bachmann.* 


I have wanted a copy ever since I saw it cited in the Barry Paris biography ever so long ago, but it has proven difficult to track down. (I had to pay a pretty penny for just this single issue.) The journal looks like what today we would call a 'zine -- it's typescript on pulpy paper reproduced by what seems like a photocopy machine, though photocopy technology wasn't available until 1959. Perhaps it's photostat or mimeograph? (I would assume relatively few were "printed." Additionally, it has that dusty-musty smell common in used book shops.) When the Group for Film Study put on screenings, copies of Cinemages were sold for 50 cents. (I paid more than 100 times that amount for my copy.)

This particular issue of Cinemages was given over to G.W. Pabst, and it features extensive interviews with six individuals who were contemporaneous with the director. They are Marc Sorkin, Paul Falkenberg, Jean Oser, Eugen Schuftan, Leo Lania, and the critic Siegfried Kracauer. (The later "interview" is merely a compilation of excerpts from Kracauer's earlier writings, including his famous 1947 book, From Caligari to Hitler: A Psychological History of the German Film.)

What drew Paris' attention (and mine) is that the first two -- Sorkin and Falkenberg -- worked with Pabst on Pandora's Box and Diary of a Lost Girl. And they talk about those two films! Aside from Brooks' writings, eyewitness accounts by others involved in either production are rare. This is choice material. Besides the six interviews, there is also an introduction by Gideon Bachmann and an annotated filmography compiled by Gavin Lambert and the British Film Institute. (This was decades before IMdB and easy access to such information.)


Earlier, I mentioned that this journal was obscure. It is, and was -- but not so much so that Louise Brooks didn't have access to it. As a matter of fact, she quotes from the Paul Falkenberg interview in her 1965 piece, "Pabst and Lulu," which appeared in Sight and Sound. Interestingly, Brooks names Falkenberg in her article, but does not reference the film journal itself, writing "... one of his assistants, Paul Falkenberg, said in 1955". I had always wondered where, exactly, Brooks got that reference, and now I know.

Excerpts from Gideon Bachmann's (GB) interview with Paul Falkenberg (PF), followed by a few bits from Bachmann's interview with Marc Sorkin (MS), can be found on the Louise Brooks Society Substack....

# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #  
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #  
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # 
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #  
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #  
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #  
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #  
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #  
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #  
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #  

 .... I found these interviews to be fascinating, even revelatory.... that Marc Sorkin only worked on part of Pandora's Box, that Louise Brooks (seemingly) wanted mood music while on set, that Falkenberg himself helped look for an actress to play Lulu, and a dozen other little details. 

For those who were wondering, over the years, Louise Brooks kept in touch with a few individuals involved with both Pandora's Box and Diary of a Lost Girl. Brooks exchanged the occasional letter and phone call with Pabst, as well as with Marc Sorkin, who was living in New York City in the 1950s. (Paul Falkenberg was also living in NYC in the 1950s, but I haven't seen any indication of them being in touch.) Brooks also was friends with Lothar Wolff, the publicist for both of her Pabst films. He too came to live in the United States, where he worked as an editor and producer.

* The sponsors for the Group for Film Study are given as Rudolph Arnheim, Jean Benoit-Levy, Rene Clair, Paul Falkenberg, David Flaherty, Abel Gance, Marcel L'Herbier, Siegfried Kracauer, Willim K. Everson, Hans Richter, Frank Stauffacher, Williard Van Dyke, and Herman G. Weinberg.

THE LEGAL STUFF: The Louise Brooks Society™ blog is authored by Thomas Gladysz, Director of the Louise Brooks Society  (www.pandorasbox.com). Original content copyright © 2026. Further unauthorized use prohibited. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.  

SUPPORT the LOUISE BROOKS SOCIETY via PAYPAL

Powered By Blogger